Monday, November 28, 2011

War drawdowns wreak havoc on Guard soldiers' lives (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Two months ago, Demetries Luckett left his job in Michigan, turned in his cable box, sent his daughter to live with her mother, and headed for Camp Shelby in Mississippi.

As a 1st lieutenant in Michigan's National Guard, he was being deployed to Afghanistan.

But just a month after he arrived for training, the Army decided Uncle Sam didn't need him after all.

Now Luckett's unemployed and back home in Harper Woods, Mich. ? a victim of the Obama administration's ongoing effort to pull at least 33,000 U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by next fall.

Unlike active-duty soldiers who are stationed at U.S. military bases across the country and can be sent on a moment's notice to a conflict anywhere in the world ? the nation's citizen soldiers have civilian jobs and lives they have to set aside when they get those deployment notices.

And unlike active-duty soldiers, Guard members may have little to go back to, if their country changes its mind.

Luckett is not alone.

In the last 60 days, as many as 8,900 Army National Guard soldiers were either sent home early from Iraq or Afghanistan, or were told that the Pentagon's plans to send them to war had either been shelved or changed. As a result, U.S. military and Guard leaders have been scrambling to find alternative missions for many of the soldiers ? particularly those who had put their lives and jobs on hold and were depending on the deployment for their livelihood.

"If you're a 25-year-old infantryman, and you're a student at Ohio State University, and you decide not to register for school in July because you were going to mobilize, and we say your services aren't needed anymore ? that becomes a significantly emotional event in that person's life," said Col. Ted Hildreth, chief of mobilization and readiness for the Army National Guard.

Guard members scheduled for deployment, he said, often quit or take extended leaves from their jobs, put college on hold, end or break their apartment leases, sell or rent their houses, and turn their medical or legal practices over to someone else. And in some cases, in this flagging economy, Guard members who may be unemployed or underemployed are relying on the year-long paycheck, which can include extra money for combat pay or tax-free benefits.

"These are commitments and contracts that have been signed, and so when these changes happen, they are not insignificant," he said. "So we work with the unit, the country team and the joint force headquarters to define who are no-kidding hardships and who we had to work to find other employments opportunities to fulfill the 400-day mobilization commitment that we made to that soldier."

In the coming weeks, as America works to extricate itself from two wars, the U.S. will pull the remaining 18,000 troops out of Iraq, and withdraw 10,000 forces from Afghanistan. Another 23,000 or more will come out of Afghanistan by next fall.

And while the political ramifications of the war drawdowns are hotly debated topics, there is often little said or known about the cascading effects such decisions have on the lives, jobs and schooling of the National Guard and Reserve troops.

Guard units are notified of their deployments as much as two years in advance, so they make long-term plans to meet the year-long military commitment.

But to meet the often-changing withdrawal timetables for Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pentagon has had to abruptly shuffle units, and even individual soldiers, around. The major moves include shifting forces from Iraq to new missions in Kuwait or to Afghanistan.

During a hearing on Capitol Hill, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the military tries to do all it can to avoid changing deployment orders given to National Guard units once they are notified.

If a unit has been mobilized, he said, "we will find a place to use it," particularly if it is an aviation unit, since those are in high demand.

Usually, he said, officials try to identify soldiers who prefer not to deploy, since there often are some who are happy to stay home. Then the rest of the unit will, if possible, be sent to a different mission in the same country or to another location.

For example, the 37th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, made up of more than 2,300 soldiers from Ohio and Michigan, was initially scheduled to go to Afghanistan in early October to do combat and other operations.

But when Pentagon leaders decided many weren't needed, they scrounged for other missions so that the soldiers who really wanted or needed to deploy could do so.

Maj. Jeff Kinninger, executive officer for the 126th Cavalry Squadron, was another soldier who got to Camp Shelby, then was told not to deploy. But for Kinninger and his family, it was more of a welcome decision because he has a full-time job working for the National Guard in Grand Rapids.

"For me, this would have been three deployments in the last seven years, so I wasn't too disappointed," said Kinninger, 42, who had served in Iraq in 2005 and 2008. "I'm disappointed not to be there with my soldiers, but my family is happy I'm not going."

His squadron is part of the 37th IBCT. So, of the 430 squadron members who headed to Camp Shelby to prepare to deploy, more than 200 were told they weren't needed. After sorting out who wanted to go home, military officials were able to find assignments for all the rest, Kinninger said.

Two other brigades are going through similar struggles ? the 27th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, based in New York, and the 29th Combat Aviation Brigade, which includes soldiers from across the U.S.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111128/ap_on_re_us/us_national_guard_war_tours

amr apple press conference apple press conference apple event apple event buccaneers buccaneers

UK Coastguard: 6 people missing after ship sinks (AP)

LONDON ? Officials says six people are missing and two are rescued after a cargo ship sank in the Irish Sea.

The Holyhead Coastguard says the Swanland cargo ship, with eight people on board, sent a mayday call early on Sunday from 20 miles (32 kilometers) northwest of the Llyn peninsula in north Wales after its hull cracked.

It said the two rescued men were taken to a Royal Air Force station on the island of Anglesey, Wales.

Jim Green, a coastguard official, says the 81-metre cargo carrier was carrying 3000 tones of limestone and it appears to have sunk.

The coastguard says two helicopters and two life boats were sent to the scene to help with the rescue efforts.

Gale-force winds battered the Irish Sea during Sunday and the coastguard believe this could have caused the incident.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111127/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_ship_sinks

diamondbacks wolf creek wolf creek arizona diamondbacks arizona diamondbacks alex rodriguez alicia witt

Sunday, November 27, 2011

No. 17 Michigan beats Ohio State 40-34

Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson (16) runs for a 41-yard touchdown during the first quarter of a college football game against Ohio State in Ann Arbor, Mich., Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)

Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson (16) runs for a 41-yard touchdown during the first quarter of a college football game against Ohio State in Ann Arbor, Mich., Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)

Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson (16) rushes for a 41-yard touchdown in the first quarter of an NCAA college football game against Ohio State, Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011, in Ann Arbor, Mich. (AP Photo/Tony Ding)

Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson (16) throws a pass in the first quarter of an NCAA college football game against Ohio State, Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011, in Ann Arbor, Mich. (AP Photo/Tony Ding)

Ohio State quarterback Braxton Miller (5)throws a 54-yard touchdown pass as defended by Michigan safety Jordan Kovacs (32) defends during the first quarter of an NCAA college football game, Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011, in Ann Arbor, Mich. (AP Photo/Tony Ding)

Ohio State wide receiver Corey Brown (10) catches a 54-yard touchdown pass in the first quarter of an NCAA college football game against Michigan, Saturday, Nov. 26, 2011, in Ann Arbor, Mich. (AP Photo/Tony Ding)

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) ? Denard Robinson accounted for five touchdowns, helping No. 17 Michigan beat Ohio State 40-34 on Saturday and snap a school-record, seven-game losing streak in the rivalry.

The Wolverines (10-2, 6-2 Big Ten) were forced to settle for a six-point lead with 1:59 left on Brendan Gibbons' career-long 43-yard field goal after two apparent TDs were negated by a video review and then penalties.

The Buckeyes (6-6, 3-5) had a chance to win the game on their final drive, but freshman Braxton Miller sailed a pass over Deviser Posey's head on what could've been a 76-yard TD and threw a loss-sealing interception to Courtney Avery.

Michigan finally beat its archrival because it had a better quarterback than Ohio State for a change.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2011-11-26-FBC-T25-Ohio-St-Michigan/id-789fb41206544a9f83db6e3c2b2ecb30

google buzz trace cyrus hilary duff pregnant hilary duff pregnant psat psat brenda song

?The Millionaire Matchmaker? Meets Silicon Valley: WePay CEO Looks For Love On Reality TV

Screen Shot 2011-11-25 at 4.07.39 AMDude I know this happened a month ago but I've been staying at my parents' now for three days and we've already had the "You should start thinking seriously about your relationships" conversation because I will soon be no longer in my twenties and if I don't get married asap I will be sent to the glue factory. So it's still relevant.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/zGRvUfSdTy4/

steve jobs quotes pancreatic cancer symptoms apple stock aspergers apple computer pancreatic cancer steve jobs

NYT: Conservatives mount air assault on Obama

Inside the debate halls, the clash may be Republican versus Republican. But offstage, conservatives are mounting a unified and expensive air assault on the candidates? common opponent: President Obama.

  1. Other political news of note

    1. Justices pressured to sit on sidelines

      First Read: Political groups are calling for Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse themselves from the pending health reform case the Supreme Court has agreed to hear.

    2. Romney: Obama doesn't understand America
    3. Boehner calls GOP deficit plan a 'fair offer'
    4. First Read: Perry plans to 'uproot' government
    5. Supreme Court to take up Obama health care law

Nearly a year before Election Day, Republican presidential candidates and conservative action groups are already spending heavily on television advertising aimed at casting Mr. Obama as a failure.

Their tactics, the aggressive and sometimes misleading kind not typically used until much further along in a campaign season, have led to a spat with Democrats in what is shaping up to be the most costly election advertising war yet.

In an advertisement from Gov. Rick Perry of Texas that is now running on national cable television, Mr. Perry looks directly into the camera and declares: ?Obama?s socialist policies are bankrupting America. We must stop him now.?

A new commercial from Mitt Romney that ran last week in New Hampshire displays a litany of depressing assertions about the economy. ?Greatest jobs crisis since Great Depression. Record home foreclosures. Record national debt.? And it renders judgment on Mr. Obama?s presidency: ?He promised he would fix the economy. He failed.?

In the past six months, conservative groups like those affiliated with Karl Rove and the billionaire industrialist Koch brothers, and, increasingly, Republican candidates themselves, have spent more than $13 million on advertisements carrying a negative message about Mr. Obama, according to an analysis by Kantar Media?s Campaign Media Analysis Group, which tracks political advertising.

And it is only going to grow more intense.

?These dollar figures we?re talking about now are going to seem quaint in a few months,? said Kenneth M. Goldstein, president of the analysis group. ?And they?ll seem really quaint in eight or nine months.?

$3 billion outlay?
Total television advertising spending on the 2012 election cycle could top $3 billion, up from $2.1 billion four years ago, Kantar estimates, fueled in part by the rise of independent groups that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money on campaigns.

Candidates have previously tended to use their early advertising to introduce themselves to voters in gauzy terms. But this time around, Mr. Obama?s opponents are betting they can employ early attacks to define an image of him at the very beginning of the election season, before Democrats fully unleash the hundreds of millions of dollars being raised by the president. Their perceived advantage: airwaves not yet clogged with competing political messages.

But going negative so early also carries substantial risks. One is that many voters are not yet paying much attention to the campaign and will not do so until much closer to next November, meaning the advertising expenditures could be largely wasted. And negative messages now could alienate moderate and independent voters who blame excessive partisanship for Washington?s troubles in addressing the nation?s big problems.

Still, the Republican candidates seem eager to escalate the fight. Mr. Romney and Mr. Perry have both brushed off criticism that they deliberately distorted Mr. Obama?s words in their most recent commercials ? controversies that only brought them additional attention.

Mr. Perry took remarks by the president about the need to do more to lure foreign investment out of context to suggest that Mr. Obama believes Americans are lazy. And Mr. Romney edited a video clip to put in Mr. Obama?s mouth a thought actually expressed by a supporter of Senator John McCain in the 2008 presidential race, misleadingly suggesting that Mr. Obama believes he cannot win if he talks about the economy.

Democrats responding
The White House and its allies have hardly been shy about going after the Republicans. Democrats have already run advertisements in Arizona, Iowa and South Carolina against Mr. Romney, who, if he wins the nomination, will be the subject of an intense Democratic effort to show him as an unprincipled flip-flopper.

Priorities USA Action, a pro-Obama group founded with the help of Bill Burton, a former White House spokesman, has spent almost a million dollars on television advertisements.

Although Mr. Obama is all but certain to have a substantial fund-raising advantage over his eventual Republican rival, Mr. Burton said that in the early going, when outside groups are playing a particularly prominent role in laying out the arguments on both sides, conservatives have a big lead over their liberal counterparts.

?This is asymmetric warfare,? he said, ?but we?re pretty confident that we?ll be more effective and more strategic in how we spend our money.?

Crossroads GPS, a conservative advocacy group founded by Mr. Rove and other Republican strategists, has placed the biggest bet so far on negative messages. By its own count, it has spent about $20 million this year on political advertising. Much of it was broadcast during the debt-ceiling debate this summer, when it singled out members of Congress with advertisements that portrayed Democrats and Mr. Obama as fiscally irresponsible and unable to fix the economy.

In recent weeks, the group has taken on Mr. Obama and his economic agenda, spending $2.6 million on a commercial that criticizes his support for an upper-income tax increase and suggests a split on the issue between Mr. Obama and former President Bill Clinton.

It ends with a nod to the Republican line of attack that Democrats are inciting class warfare: ?President Obama, it?s time to attack problems, not people.?

Crossroads has been accused of not portraying Mr. Clinton?s words accurately. While he did express doubt that raising taxes in a sluggish economy could be effective, he said he supported the general principle of higher taxes for the wealthy.

Focus on swing states
Many of the Crossroads advertisements have been running in swing states like Colorado, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania and have been timed to coincide with presidential trips.

?It creates a scenario where the president?s visit is greeted with a strong counterpoint to the argument he?s making,? said Jonathan Collegio, communications director for Crossroads GPS.

?And in battleground states where the issue framing is going to impact 2012, it?s critical to be making your point there early and often,? Mr. Collegio said. ?There may be some value in advertising now that will be impossible to achieve toward the end of the campaign, when virtually all of the advertising on television and radio is political.?

Crossroads is hardly the only conservative group that is spending heavily on anti-Obama advertising, thanks in large part to court decisions that have allowed independent organizations to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money. Americans for Prosperity, the organization founded with the backing of David H. and Charles G. Koch, is also playing a busy early role.

The Americans for Prosperity approach has been slightly different, portraying the Obama administration as not just fiscally imprudent but also corrupt. In its latest advertisement, a 60-second spot that has been running heavily in places across Florida, Michigan, Nevada and Virginia, an announcer repeatedly names Solyndra, the government-backed solar power company that went bankrupt and has become a focus of conservative anger over wasteful spending.

Then it suggests that Solyndra?s political ties to Democrats played a role in its winning a government loan guarantee: ?Is this the change we?re supposed to believe in? Tell President Obama you shouldn?t use taxpayer dollars for political favors.?

An analysis from Kantar Media showed that in recent weeks Americans for Prosperity has already spent $2.4 million buying airtime for the advertisement, which has been broadcast nearly 4,000 times.

This article, "TV Attack Ads Aim at Obama Early and Often," first appeared in The New York Times.

Copyright ? 2011 The New York Times

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45450961/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/

earthquake today droid razr oklahoma news atomic clock earthquake map giants geoffrey mutai

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Formula 1 Driver Lewis Hamilton Still Loves Nicole Scherzinger

Formula 1 Driver Lewis Hamilton Still Loves Nicole Scherzinger

  Lewis Hamilton has admitted he is still in love with his former girlfriend Nicole Scherzinger. The Formula 1 driver and former Pussycat Doll split [...]

Formula 1 Driver Lewis Hamilton Still Loves Nicole Scherzinger Stupid Celebrities Gossip Stupid Celebrities Gossip News


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/stupidcelebrities/~3/5tSP_aRpmyI/

sprint iphone sprint iphone defamation solyndra tesla model s tesla model s prohibition

93% 50/50

All Critics (153) | Top Critics (40) | Fresh (143) | Rotten (10)

Still, it's Gordon-Levitt's choices that continue to impress. Sure, he owned one of the most jaw-dropping sequences in last summer's blockbuster Inception. But the actor remains drawn to profoundly human-scale hurts and quiet triumphs.

Gordon-Levitt is an agreeably undemonstrative actor who plays well opposite the burbly Rogen.

Chances are about 90/10 that you'll enjoy 50/50.

Scene by scene, 50/50 can be both amusing and moving, with the tightly wound Gordon-Levitt and the boundaryless Rogen forming an oddly complementary pair. But as a whole the movie never quite coheres.

In other hands, Adam might well be hard to take. But as the comedy in 50/50 turns darker, Gordon-Levitt, who's maybe the most natural, least affected actor of his generation, makes prickly plenty engaging.

An everyman tale with plenty of heart and honesty, the serious subject matter is regularly enlivened with jolts of genuine hilarity, some of it in delightfully questionable taste.

The Gordon-Levitt-Rogen bromance is one of the most exciting and fun ones in recent comedy history, and the pair have a wonderful natural rift ...

Seth Rogen might be there to puts bums on seats, but it's Joseph Gordon-Levitt who will keep you watching.

It may be a marketing nightmare, but as examinations of mortality go, few come funnier, wiser or more astutely acted.

Whether you're after a comedy-drama about cancer or a Rogen laugh-fest with added heart, this does a remarkable job of balancing the odds.

This is the terminal illness weepie for people who don't watch terminal illness weepies, and it's much the better for it.

It's refreshing to see a movie that embraces the ugly side of what happens to complicated personal relationships. Its quite uncomfortable at times, and the frank exploration of the cancer patient journey makes the comedy even funnier.

It is tough to make a comedy about cancer, since it touches us all. It is not funny. When you have Seth Rogen in a film, however, anything can be funny.

The elements of 50/50 that do work are strong enough to carry the film along and affecting enough to bring losers like me to tears in their cinema seats.

Tackles a distressing subject with a healthy dose of humour, thanks to a sharply observed script, well-rounded, likeable characters, astute direction and a trio of terrific performances from Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Seth Rogen and Anna Kendrick.

There couldn't be a more serious subject, yet Gordon-Levitt and especially Rogen (who co-produced the movie) make the comedy seem both spontaneous and organic.

Nimbly switching gears between heartful drama and uproarious comedy, 50/50 tackles the near-impossible and makes a film about cancer that'll have you crying like a baby one minute and laughing so hard your sides hurt the next.

Jonathan Levine directs a film that may be one of the year's best but still makes one yearn for the serious and uncompromising films of the 1950s and 1960s.

Yes, cancer can be funny. Sort of.

Films about cancer aren't generally this funny. And while this movie isn't a comedy, beyond its generous dose of realistic humour, it has a smart, personal script that dares to face a difficult situation head on.

Life is hard. Cancer is hard. Relationships are hard. Family is hard. '50/50' managed to find the power in all of those things and give us plenty of laughs so we're not simply in a ball crying.

A near-great movie made out of the hardest-to-thread, most oxymoronic genre imaginable - "cancer comedy."

a good movie with a moderate sense of daring that ultimately spends too much time telling the wrong story

With its excellent cast and emotionally intelligent script, 50/50 isn't necessarily a feel good movie about cancer, but is an exceptional telling of one man's story, mixed with a perfect balance of sympathy and laughs.

Interesting commentary on how we deal with difficult situations, and makes a strong case for our desperate need for each other -- especially when the odds are stacked against us.

More Critic Reviews

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/5050_2011/

new orleans saints world series game 4 world series game 4 indianapolis colts colts colts turkey

Yemeni doctors: 5 killed in demonstration (AP)

SANAA, Yemen ? President Ali Abdullah Saleh's agreement to step down failed to end Yemen's violence Thursday as security forces killed five protesters demanding that the ousted leader be put on trial for past crimes ranging from corruption to bloodshed during the current uprising.

Saleh signed the U.S.-backed power-transfer deal, brokered by neighboring countries, Wednesday in the Saudi capital Riyadh. It officially transfers power to his vice president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

But many doubt that the deal marks the end of political life for Saleh, who has proved to be a wily politician and suggested in remarks after the signing ceremony that he could play a future political role in the country, along with his ruling party. He had agreed to sign the deal three times before, only to back away at the last minute.

The tens of thousands of protesters in Yemen, who have distanced themselves from the formal opposition movement, rejected the immunity clause, saying Saleh should face justice for allegations of corruption by the regime as well as the recent bloodshed as his forces try to put down the uprising against his 33-year rule.

Demonstrators camped out in the capital of Sanaa chanted "No immunity for the killer" and vowed to continue their protests.

Security forces and government supporters opened fire on that camp Thursday, killing five protesters with live ammunition, said Gameela Abdullah, a medic at the local field hospital.

The deal ? which officially transferred power to his vice president and calls for early presidential elections within 90 days ? also could open the way to what will likely be a messy power struggle, although a national unity government is supposed to oversee a two-year transitional period.

Among those possibly vying for power are Saleh's son and nephew, who command the country's best-equipped military units; powerful tribal leaders; and the commander of a renegade battalion.

Saleh had stubbornly clung to power despite nearly 10 months of huge street protests in which hundreds of people were killed by his security forces. At one point, Saleh's palace mosque was bombed and he was treated in Saudi Arabia for severe burns.

"The signature is not what is important," Saleh said after signing the agreement. "What is important is good intentions and dedication to serious, loyal work at true participation to rebuild what has been destroyed by the crisis during the last 10 months."

International leaders who had long pushed for the deal applauded Saleh's signature, many hoping it would help end a security breakdown that has allowed Yemen's active al-Qaida branch to step up operations in the country's weakly governed provinces.

President Barack Obama welcomed the decision, saying the U.S. would stand by the Yemeni people "as they embark on this historic transition."

King Abdullah also praised Saleh, telling Yemenis the plan would "open a new page in your history" and lead to greater freedom and prosperity.

Italy's foreign minister, Giulio Terzi, lauded the agreement and called for an end to violence.

"Now it is necessary that the accord is fully implemented and that all violence cease," he said.

___

Al-Haj reported from Cairo.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111124/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_yemen

lavar arrington yu darvish hope solo dancing with the stars hope solo dancing with the stars jack wagner matt jones snow white and the huntsman trailer

Occupy Alaska protestors keep vigil despite the cold (Reuters)

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) ? Forget pepper spray. anti-Wall Street demonstrators in Alaska have a different challenge -- bitter cold that tests their commitment to around-the-clock protests.

Groups backing the nationwide Occupy movement are protesting in Anchorage and Fairbanks, often defying sub-zero temperatures and the risk of frostbite to protest against economic inequality and excesses of the financial system.

In Anchorage, protesters rotate in and out of their tent camp, making sure that at least a couple of people are always keeping vigil at the site established in Town Square, a downtown park.

Participants believe they have an obligation to continue their protest, now a month long, in solidarity with their counterparts in the Lower 48, said John Heuerman, a university student and waiter taking part in the demonstration.

"We're out here supporting the rest of the country. And you know they know about us," Heuerman said.

A hardier contingent in Fairbanks has been camped for two months in a local park, withstanding temperatures dropping to about minus 40 degrees, record cold for this time of year.

"I think that a sense of patience and endurance is happening here, if we hang in there and we endure, that things are going to change," said Brent Baccala, a self-described Christian street minister and a software designer.

"It's important for us, as the coldest and the farthest north, to set that example," he said.

Aside from a few trespassing arrests earlier this month when Anchorage protesters created what was deemed to be a disturbance at a local Wells Fargo bank branch, there have been no clashes with police.

In Anchorage, city officials and the Occupy group have agreed on a temporary move to allow a traditional Christmas tree festival to proceed at Town Square.

But the Fairbanks protesters are grating on some local nerves. At least one local resident has taken issue with their use of a park dedicated to military veterans. Newly erected counter-protest signs proclaim the site to be "Hallowed by Veterans" but "Occupied by Hippies."

There are also concerns about damage from protester campfires and temporary structures, and even about protesters' safety, Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Luke Hopkins said.

Protesters appeared to be violating park rules by camping overnight with tents, Hopkins said. While he respected their political commitment, he said, "I don't see it's a First Amendment right that they ought to have shelter from the cold."

Hopkins said he hoped to persuade the protesters to move over the Thanksgiving holiday to an alternative site. But Occupy Fairbanks seemed inclined to stay put.

"I'm starting to think that we're certainly in it for the winter," Baccala said. The group survived the worst of the cold, and the weather had improved by Tuesday night, he said. "It's warmed up. It's about minus-10," he said.

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Cynthia Johnston)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111123/us_nm/us_protests_alaska

james ray williston nd williston nd mists of pandaria mists of pandaria 20 20 war in iraq

Friday, November 25, 2011

Cranberry in a can sacred on many holiday menus

(AP) ? Nicholas Mackara isn't about to drive over to his parents' house for Thanksgiving to sit down to a dish of some fancy homemade cranberry sauce that Martha Stewart might serve. He's so determined that his cranberry sauce come from a can that he assigns himself the job of bringing it.

It's a thing of beauty on his holiday table, a log-shaped gelatinous roll with ridges that signal to purists like himself that no one is trying to put an imposter on the menu.

"I think the ridges are the most important part," said the 21-year-old resident of Clementon, N.J. "Then you know it definitely came from a can and our mom didn't make her own (cranberry) sauce and put it in a cylinder shape before we got there."

If Thanksgiving is a time for a family meal, it's also a time for a recurring debate: Should the sauce come from the can or a time-honored family recipe? Though it's impossible to tell how many others have drawn that line in the stuffing over this Thanksgiving staple the way Mackara has, it's clear he's got a lot of company. Ocean Spray, the nation's largest producer of cranberry sauce, reports that of the 86.4 million cans it sells a year, 72 million of them are sold between September and the end of December.

On Facebook, groups devoted to canned cranberry sauce have popped up ? from the one Mackara and a friend, Alexandra Shephard, launched a few years back called "Cranberry Sauce in the shape of the can makes my Thanksgiving" to "When Cranberry Sauce comes out of the can with ridges." There's also one called "Cranberry Sauce is only good if it's in the shape of a can," which includes the motto: "If it ain't from a can, it's garbage."

In an era where there are television networks devoted to home cooking and dietitians warn against the dangers of processed foods, the love of canned cranberry can seem like a bit of a dietary discord. Devotees of canned cranberry sauce say the reasons begin and end with the past, and that the sight of the glistening can-shaped tube of jelly conjures up memories of Thanksgiving meals of long ago.

"It looks like a log of happiness," said Shannon Ervin, a 24-year-old mother of three in Harahan, La., who can't remember a Thanksgiving when canned cranberry sauce wasn't served.

Sandy Oliver, a food historian, said it would be hard to overstate the importance of canned cranberry sauce to some families, particularly for a holiday in which even the slightest change in the menu is viewed as a treasonous offense.

"You don't mess with Thanksgiving," said Oliver, co-author of "Giving Thanks: Thanksgiving Recipes and History, from Pilgrims to Pumpkin Pie." "If you grew up with canned cranberry sauce on Thanksgiving, that is what will taste right for you at the table and if you do something else it is going to be at variance with your childhood memory."

As a result, normally sophisticated eaters load up their plates with the same green bean casseroles, Jell-O salad ? heavy on the mini marshmallows ? and the white bread stuffing their parents piled on their plates when they were busy kicking their brothers and sisters under the table.

"My aunt one year brought over the homemade kind and nobody but her ate it," said Heather Hoffman, a 24-year-old Chicago teacher, who has had canned cranberry sauce since her grandmother served it when she was a little girl.

Robert Sietsema has heard those kinds of comments before. The New York writer recently included canned cranberry sauce among his five worst Thanksgiving dishes for a blog on the Village Voice and can't believe anybody would eat canned cranberry sauce if they didn't have to.

"I hate it, it's just awful," said Sietsem. "To begin with, nobody eats things from cans any more if they can afford not to." Especially, he says if it's "some kind of freak Jell-O."

Maybe so. But Alexandra Shephard arrived at her parents' house in Williamsburg, Va. from her home in Orlando, Fla., this week fully expecting the familiar sight of cranberry sauce sliding from the can to a dish.

"I remember how intrigued I was at the lump of red jelly stuff that retained the shape of a can," said Shephard, who started the Facebook page with Mackara a couple years back. "I don't remember actually eating it (but) I remember it was always at the table."

Her father, she said, would only eat the canned sauce so eventually she got her courage up and tried homemade cranberry sauce even though she knew she didn't like the taste of the bitter little red berries. And she liked them, precisely because it didn't taste like cranberries.

She looks at it as a feat of engineering that the can-shaped sauce can keep its figure for hours. And she eats it because, just as Oliver suggested, she likes the uncranberryness of sauce, from the texture to the sweet taste.

For Bruce Scheonberger, presentation is everything. That helps explain why the 54-year-old Toledo attorney was eager to share a technique that ensures the cranberry sauce he puts on the table this Thanksgiving will look exactly the same as it always has.

After completely opening one end of the can, he makes a small opening in the other end. "You blow in it gently and it slides out and retains all of its ridges," he said. "I have it sitting straight up like a can."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2011-11-23-Cranberry%20in%20a%20Can/id-d731b92c7afe4192a8943340fd9da7e0

stacey dash deep impact the time machine cloverfield take shelter take shelter dressage

Manage podcasts on your iPad with Instacast HD

Vemedio has released Instacast HD which is an iPad version of the hugely popular Instacast iPhone app for managing your podcasts. If you are a user of the iPhone version and want the same experience on your iPad, now you can. Even better, Instacast uses iCloud to...


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/N3S5xfk8DtA/story01.htm

workaholics new iphone 5 release mary j blige cole hamels cole hamels curtis painter apple news conference

Thursday, November 24, 2011

NBC Up All Night, Macy?s Thanksgiving Day Parade & The National Dog Show Preview Videos

It is almost Turkey and you know what means the Macy?s Thanksgiving Day parade, woohoo! I have a little sneak peek at the infamous parade as well as Up All Night and The National Dog Show. NBC has some fabulous shows lined up for the night before Thanksgiving and the holiday itself. Let me tell you this is some good stuff that you are not going to want to miss but you don?t have to take my word for it just watch the below preview video clips. Tonight it is a brand new Up All Night and Jason Lee is back, which is awesome. He and Will Arnett spend some quality time together and it is hilarious. These two are funny without even trying which is what makes them such a freaking good comedy team. And then tomorrow is The Macy?s Thanksgiving Day parade which I so love. Every year it is a must see for me and after watching the below clip with Head Designer John Piper I am even more psyched than ever. He talks about what viewers can expect this year. The festivities begin at 9AM sharp so don?t miss out. Immediately following the parade is The [...]

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/-pGpCgN980U/

williston nd williston nd mists of pandaria mists of pandaria 20 20 war in iraq war in iraq

PFT: Smooth sailing ahead for Patriots

DeAngelo+Hall+San+Francisco+49ers+v+Washington+xQa1ByarhAElGetty Images

After Sunday?s loss to the Cowboys, which was capped by Dallas receiver Dez Bryant beating Redskins cornerback DeAngelo Hall for a gain that preceded the game-winning field goal, Hall said he?s so bad that the team should cut him.

Hall now says that he has heard from a laundry list of NFL greats regarding his greatness.

?I had so many calls from other guys in the league telling me how great I was as a corner,? Hall said, via the Associated Press.? ?And I?m, like, ?Dude, I?m not on suicide watch.?? It was amazing, just the reaction that I didn?t think it was going to get.?

Hall claimed that he heard from men like Larry Fitzgerald, Ben Roethlisberger, Chad Ochocinco (OK, they aren?t all great players), and Ray Lewis.

But before Mr. Martini declares that he busted the juke-a-box, let?s consider whether Hall was having a crisis of confidence ? or whether he was hoping to get a free ticket out of town in the hopes of signing with a contender for the stretch run.? After all, Hall was once cut by the Raiders after earning $8 million for eight games, before landing in D.C. and eventually pocketing another big-money contract.? Now that he?s playing for a bad team with no immediate prospects for success, maybe that was the first step of a clumsy, passive-aggressive exit strategy.

If that?s the goal, he?s still holding out hope.? Indeed, he reiterated his position on Wednesday.

?I stand by it,? Hall said. ?I wear this ?C? on my chest for a reason. I hold myself to a higher standard than a lot of other people.?

Then came the possible glimpse into his soul.

?I probably haven?t been as productive as I would like to,? Hall said.? ?I don?t know if this defense is built for a corner to go out here and get eight or nine picks or seven picks.? It?s built to stop the deep ball and manage the game.?

In other words (possibly), ?I want out.?

If he really wants out, we?d have more respect for Hall if he simply laid down on the job.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/21/patriots-cruise-to-commanding-afc-east-lead/related/

gaddafi bodyguards gaddafi bodyguards muammar gaddafi muammar gaddafi lord monckton lord monckton andy kaufman

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

UK steel town bears scars of government cuts (Reuters)

MIDDLESBROUGH, England (Reuters) ? In the former British industrial powerhouse of Middlesbrough, a skyline once dominated by smoke-belching chimneys and steel mill furnaces now features a monumental piece of public art and an elegant new state college clad in silver and bronze.

The town's harsh industrial landscape inspired film director Ridley Scott, a son of north-east England, in his vision for the science fiction film "Blade Runner."

But many of its factories closed long ago and nearly half of the workforce now relies on the public sector.

Like so many places in Britain that came to depend on public jobs after the decline of their old industries, Middlesbrough faces an uncertain future as Prime Minister David Cameron tries to cut spending and avoid the sort of debt crisis that has toppled governments across Europe.

The town of 139,000 people, close to where the River Tees meets the windswept northeast coast, has been described as the place most vulnerable to Britain's cuts.

Its university expanded rapidly under the last Labour government, the hospital was rebuilt and a public art gallery sprang up in an elegant new town square as politicians poured money into Middlesbrough and other deprived areas.

Now the tap has been turned off and the Conservative-led coalition is trying to wipe out a budget deficit that peaked at around 11 percent of GDP -- a move that is expected to lead to the loss of 400,000 public sector jobs.

"Yes, we did have a policy as a Labour government, with all of these heavy industries going: We pushed people into the public sector where they were working, getting a salary, paying taxes and were part of the consumer society," said Stuart Bell, the town's Labour member of parliament since 1983.

It is the north of Britain which was ravaged by Conservative prime minister Margaret Thatcher's policy of running down uncompetitive industries in the 1980s -- creating Britain's notorious north-south divide. It now faces the brunt again given the drive to revive the region with public money.

While Britain may be on track to meet its deficit-cutting targets this year, the weak outlook means finance minister George Osborne is expected to have to accept lower growth forecasts when he sets out his latest fiscal plans in parliament on November 29.

His deficit plan is based on forecasts for 1.7 percent growth this year. Lower growth, or even a return to recession, would leave a stark choice of having to cut deeper or let the austerity drive falter, which would threaten Britain's 'AAA' credit rating and raise its borrowing costs.

The Labour party says Osborne must think again and find a growth strategy. He insists that record low borrowing costs for Britain shows his path is the right one and blames the euro zone debt crisis for the economy's downturn.

'INFANT HERCULES'

Walk through the old docks of a town once described by 19th century prime minister William Gladstone as the "infant Hercules" of the Industrial Revolution and the public sector's importance is clear.

Under grey skies, rows of houses are boarded up, warehouses lie empty and barbed wire fences surround derelict plots waiting for a state-backed development that suffered a setback last week when the government's main private partner pulled out.

The only boat moored near the town's landmark blue steel Transporter Bridge is a rusting hulk called the Tuxedo Royale, a former nightclub that is slowly sinking into the chilly water.

Nearby, public money largely paid for a 100-meter (328 ft) long sculpture by artist Anish Kapoor that has gone up by the river, close to a futuristic, metal-clad college building.

The town's enlarged university won an award in 2009, the hospital boasts that it is one of Europe's most modern medical centers and an art gallery has opened next to the gothic town hall.

A similar picture of redevelopment can be seen across Britain, in cities like Manchester, Liverpool and Newcastle. However, such public largesse will be rarer in the coming years.

Total public spending rose to around 47 percent of national income by the time Labour lost power in 2010, up from 40 percent at the end of the last Conservative administration in 1997. It is forecast to fall back to 40 percent by 2015-16, according to finance ministry figures.

Union leaders say the cuts threaten to reverse a lot of the progress and scoff at the government's much-vaunted hope that the private sector will drive growth after a year of stagnation, creating more jobs and boosting exports.

"The private sector just isn't creating jobs at the minute on any kind of scale," said Kevin Rowan, regional secretary for the Trades Union Congress, an umbrella group for 58 unions.

Investment from Thailand's Sahaviriya Steel Industries will restart the nearby Redcar blast furnace next month, nearly a year after it was mothballed. Plans to build new high-speed trains down the road in County Durham are expected to create hundreds of jobs. Local business groups have high hopes for green industries and hi-tech firms.

But the town's MP says more must be done to encourage companies to keep hiring, including giving them tax breaks.

"The more money you suck out of the economy, the less growth you'll get," Bell said. About 18,000 of Middlesbrough's 88,000 working population are already on some sort of state benefits.

"People are going to have to get used to a totally different standard of living. There is going to be a lot more unrest within society," Bell said.

Cameron says the country must stick to its austerity plans to keep the markets' confidence and blames Labour, which ruled Britain from 1997 to 2010 under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, for borrowing and spending too much.

Nationally, the unemployment rate has not climbed as steeply as in previous downturns. But most economists say government cuts are only at an early stage and many more job losses are likely with the young hit hardest.

Official data showed the number of young people soared to a record of more than one million last month.

"There will be more of the same because the economy is not growing fast enough to push unemployment down," said Alan Clarke, economist at Scotia Capital.

The Conservative leader has scrapped nine regional development agencies that spent government and European Union money to try to boost growth. They are being replaced by 38 bodies that will aim to make local authorities work more closely with private companies.

The impact of the cuts is bound to be painful for many families, particularly in northeast England, and it is hard to see what the government can do to encourage the private sector to expand in places like Middlesbrough, analysts said.

Professor Jim Tomlinson, an economic policy expert at the University of Dundee in Scotland, said the state "had picked up the pieces" in former industrial cities and will struggle to withdraw.

"The state has never played such a big role in employment in Britain," he said, adding that the cuts will only take public spending as a percentage of GDP back to 2004 levels. "Frankly, I can't see how it can change that much.

"There is a lot of rhetoric about rebalancing and how the public sector has got to play a smaller role. But it's not as if nobody wanted the private sector to flourish in these places before -- it's just that it didn't."

Professor Henry Overman, director of the Spatial Economics Research Center at the London School of Economics, said there was "remarkably little evidence" to support opposing political arguments about what happens if the state cuts jobs in an area.

Many Conservatives say a powerful public sector often stifles job creation, while Labour argues that public investment is vital and has a ripple effect, generating extra posts.

"In reality, both sides are exaggerating," Overman said.

The debate about the size of the state and what role, if any, it should play in the economy stretches back centuries. But in Middlesbrough's shopping district, most people were worried about day-to-day concerns.

Inflation is running at 5 percent while wage growth is non-existent and unemployment is at a 15-year high.

"It feels like every month you're working longer hours, getting less money and paying bigger bills," said builder Ali Hussain, 46, summing up the popular mood.

(Reporting by Peter Griffiths, editing by Mike Peacock)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111123/lf_nm_life/us_britain_economy_middlesbrough

vince young vince young tony stewart amas desean jackson music awards 2011 music awards 2011

Analysis: Gingrich gambles in bid to catch Romney

Republican presidential candidates former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talk with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at a Republican presidential debate in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Republican presidential candidates former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talk with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at a Republican presidential debate in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks at a Republican presidential debate in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney answers a question during a Republican presidential debate in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

(AP) ? Newt Gingrich, a political gambler his whole life, is banking on unorthodox stands on immigration, Social Security and other issues to propel him past Mitt Romney in the Republican presidential contest.

In a few weeks, GOP voters in Iowa and New Hampshire will show whether they think the best person to challenge President Barack Obama is a comparative stranger to Washington politics or a contentious and sometimes cantankerous veteran of decades of inside-the-Beltway battles.

Gingrich, 68, may be the most familiar of the eight Republican candidates. But he has never been a play-it-safe politician. He has a long career of highs and lows to prove it.

Romney, meanwhile, is sticking with his run-out-the-clock strategy. He's adhering to GOP orthodoxy on immigration, not making too much noise about Social Security, and focusing his criticisms on Obama.

His strategy has kept him fairly steady in the polls for months while others ? notably Rep. Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and businessman Herman Cain ? have risen and fallen. Now it's Gingrich, the history-quoting former House speaker, with a chance to prove he's the Romney alternative who can rally and inspire Republican voters.

With time running short, he's drawing attention to himself with a familiar mix of big ideas, huge confidence and occasional bombast.

Gingrich highlighted his break with traditional GOP thinking on immigration Tuesday in a televised debate, stepping into a touchy area that tripped up Perry earlier this year. Gingrich said he favors pathways to legal status for illegal immigrants who have lived peaceful, law-abiding, tax-paying lives in the United States for many years.

"I don't see how the party that says it's the party of the family is going to adopt an immigration policy which destroys families which have been here a quarter-century," Gingrich said in the forum, televised on CNN. "I'm prepared to take the heat for saying let's be humane in enforcing the law."

That spells amnesty to some critics of illegal immigration. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor and the GOP establishment's favorite, was among those who refused to play along. Any type of pathway to legal status is a magnet for more unlawful crossings from Mexico, Romney said.

Immigration has vexed U.S. politicians for years. Many analysts say Republicans risk angering the fast-growing Hispanic population by showing little sympathy for the millions of illegal residents already here.

Gingrich, like fellow Republicans John McCain and George W. Bush, has supported more lenient immigration policies in the past. On Tuesday he chose to portray his record as humane and courageous. In coming days, GOP insiders will watch to see if voter reaction mirrors the rebuke that Perry suffered for saying people are heartless if they don't support his policy of granting in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants.

"Newt did himself significant harm tonight on immigration among caucus and primary voters," said Tim Albrecht, deputy chief of staff to Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, on Twitter.

Pushing new ideas for conservative governance and congressional reform, Gingrich led the 1994 Republican revolution that put his party in control of the House for the first time in 40 years. Four years later, after overreaching in his battles with President Bill Clinton and even some fellow Republicans, Gingrich was dumped from leadership. He soon left Congress.

Since then he has lectured, written books, made documentaries and earned millions of dollars as a consultant to organizations, including Freddie Mac, a backer of thousands of home mortgages.

Eyeballs sometimes roll when Gingrich cites his books, college degrees and big-thinking proclivities. But he's rarely dull. On Tuesday he detailed why he thinks the United States should follow Chile's model of making Social Security accounts private for workers.

"It has increased the economy, increased the growth of jobs, increased the amount of wealth, and it dramatically solves Social Security without a payment cut and without having to hurt anybody," Gingrich said.

Cain, who struggled to break through in Tuesday's foreign-policy-focused debate, also has hailed the Chilean model, but in less detail than Gingrich.

Reviews from Chileans are more mixed than Gingrich suggests. But any talk of privatizing Social Security runs risks in this country. That's especially true in general elections, when Democrats and independents vote.

Americans soundly rejected Bush's bid to partly privatize the government retirement program just after his 2004 reelection as president. Many Republicans have avoided the subject ever since, or at least addressed it more gently than Gingrich.

Gingrich also has criticized abortion with greater emphasis and detail than some of his rivals. He supports a national "personhood amendment," which would define life as beginning at conception. It would effectively ban all abortions and some forms of birth control. Mississippi voters resoundingly rejected a similar measure in a state referendum this month.

Romney once supported legalized abortion but now opposes it. He says a future Supreme Court should overturn the Roe v. Wade ruling that barred states from outlawing abortion.

Romney took few chances in Tuesday's debate. He is all but ignoring his GOP rivals as he sharpens his attacks on Obama. His campaign drew fire Tuesday for a new TV ad that quotes Obama out of context in a 2008 speech about the economy.

The CNN debate offered significant TV time for Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum. But few veterans of Republican campaigns give them a chance to win the nomination.

Gingrich, for now, seems to have the best chance to derail Romney, but his history of groundbreaking political achievements and stark blunders leaves some GOP insiders unwilling to predict the results.

Republican campaign consultant Matt Mackowiak said Gingrich "made his view on immigration more persuasively than Perry had previously." But Gingrich will suffer if it "can be construed as amnesty," he said.

"Gingrich's mouth got him back into the race," Mackowiak said. "And it very well might take him right back out."

---

Charles Babington covers politics for the Associated Press.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2011-11-23-GOP%20Debate-Analysis/id-537579ec84404663b1c1f5c14b64c41b

conrad murray verdict tappan zee bridge philadelphia eagles jessica chastain jessica chastain nook tablet eagles

Jim Breyer Doesn?t Think More IPOs Are The Answer

Jim Breyer (closeup)In this video interview, I ask VC Jim Breyer what he thinks about the current IPO market and whether he agrees with Steve Case, who argues that we need more IPOs to create more jobs??90% of job growth is after a company goes public.? Breyer disagrees with Case that IPOs are the answer. At About the 2:35 mark, he says that the IPO process could be made a little bit easier, but ushering in a flood of IPOs could cause more problems than it solves. " What I would never want to see is a repeat of when public companies were created twice a day and investors lost 80% of their money," he cautions.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Xz8SG8r29q0/

roger craig roger craig cadillac xts rambus rambus pabst blue ribbon pabst blue ribbon

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Neutrino fever produces media storm

Lisa Grossman, reporter

The internet is hungry for news about neutrinos, and it is being fed ? even if that news is, well, old.

Last week, the OPERA collaboration announced the results of new tests that bolstered their stunning result, first announced in September, that neutrinos go faster than light.

The saga of those Einstein-defying neutrinos appeared to take a dramatic turn today, with a flood of news stories reporting that a second experiment in the same lab showed that the subatomic particles are obeying the speed limit after all.

Time and repeated experiments will tell which group is right. But it bears mentioning that the results of the second experiment are not new. A number of outlets ? including New Scientist ? reported it a month ago after a paper about it was posted online.

The feeding frenzy seems to have been sparked by a press release that landed in our inboxes this morning from the UK Science Media Centre, "an independent venture working to promote the voices, stories and views of the scientific community to the national news media when science is in the headlines". The centre offered a comment from physicist Jim Al-Khalili of the University of Surrey, who, when the initial news broke in September, had publicly vowed to eat his boxer shorts on live television if the result held up.

When the news broke on Friday that the OPERA team had redone their experiment with a new and improved particle beam, and the troubling neutrinos didn't go away, Al-Khalili's inbox apparently overflowed with people demanding he follow through. As he blogged on Friday:

"I have been prompted to write this blog, instead of chilling with a glass of wine after a busy week and watching a movie on TV, because of the flurry of comments via email and Twitter that I have received today regarding the latest news from the Opera neutrino experiment... Now, many people mistakenly believe that this second repeated experiment is the confirmation needed for me to fetch the ketchup."

He went on to explain how a pair of theorists at Boston University, Andrew Cohen and Nobel laureate Sheldon Glashow, predicted on 29 September ? less than a week after OPERA announced their original results ? that such speedy neutrinos should leave a tell-tale trail of particles in their wakes. As we wrote at the time:


In the paper, Glashow and Cohen point out that if neutrinos can travel faster than light, then when they do so they should sometimes radiate an electron paired with its antimatter equivalent ? a positron ? through a process called Cerenkov radiation, which is analogous to a sonic boom. Each electron-positron pair should carry away a large chunk of the neutrinos' energy: Cohen and Glashow calculated that at the end of the experiment, the neutrinos should have had energies no higher than about 12 gigaelectronvolts. But OPERA saw plenty of neutrinos with energies upwards of 40 GeV.

The ICARUS collaboration, which has been studying the same beam of neutrinos as OPERA since last year, looked for just that sort of radiation, and didn't find any. They put out a paper on 17 October saying: "Our results therefore refute a superluminal interpretation of the OPERA result." Again, we and others wrote about it at the time.

Al-Khalili is not a member of the OPERA or ICARUS teams, and the memo from the Science Media Centre was presented as an "expert reaction". But many in the media reacted as if the ICARUS paper was hot off the press, even as they linked to an updated preprint dated 22 October and physics blogs from the same week.

It just goes to show how desperate we all are to hear something definitive about these neutrinos. Stay tuned.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/1a486d27/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Cblogs0Cshortsharpscience0C20A110C110Cneutrino0Efever0Eproduces0Emedia0Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

brandon lloyd publishers clearing house scare tactics stacy keibler stacy keibler dancing with the stars season 13 cast tay sachs

GM continues Europe leadership shakeup (AP)

DETROIT ? A leadership shake-up at General Motors Co.'s money-losing European unit continued Monday as the company named Vice Chairman Stephen Girsky as head of the board that oversees the bulk of GM's operations on the continent.

Girsky replaces Nick Reilly, who resigned from the Opel supervisory board and announced his retirement as president of GM Europe earlier this month.

GM also appointed Chief Financial Officer Dan Ammann and International Operations President Tim Lee to the 20-member Opel board, which governs Adam Opel AG, made up of GM's Opel brand and its British Vauxhall brand. Lee will take the post created with Girsky's promotion to chairman, while Ammann will take a seat vacated by Opel sales and marketing Chief Financial Officer Keith Ward.

In 2009, Girsky led a successful effort to shoot down plans to sell GM's European operations to a group of investors led by Canadian auto parts maker Magna International Inc. Girsky, a former financial analyst, has served on the Opel board since January of 2010. He has represented the United Auto Workers union's retiree health care trust fund on the GM board since July of 2009, when the company emerged from bankruptcy protection.

"GM is committed to Opel and wants the brand to grow in a profitable way," Girsky said in a statement. "To realize Opel's full potential, we will continue to optimize its cost structure, improve margins and better leverage GM's scale."

GM announced earlier this month that Reilly would retire as head of GM Europe in March of next year. Opel-Vauxhall CEO Karl Stracke, a former chief of engineering at GM, will replace him starting Jan. 1.

GM's European unit swung to a pretax loss of $292 million in the third quarter. The loss forced GM to back off of a forecast of breaking even in Europe this year.

Europe faces a financial crisis and could slip into recession. Growth is slow is several key nations. Italy, the region's third-biggest economy, is bucking under the weight of government debt, and the region is dealing with high unemployment, stingy bank lending and declining exports.

GM CEO Dan Akerson said earlier this month when the company announced its third-quarter results that the European performance is unacceptable and said GM must look for more ways to control costs. But he stopped short of giving specifics or talking about plant closures or layoffs.

Last week, Akerson also wouldn't give specifics, but he made reference to French competitor Peugeot Citroen SA's plan cut 6,000 jobs because of flat demand in Europe.

Sales in Europe are about 18 percent of GM's 2.2 million global total, but they are expected to weaken as the economy slows in the fourth quarter.

GM shares fell 53 cents, or 2.4 percent, to $21.15 as the broader market dropped in afternoon trading.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gm_europe_leadership

lord howe island conficker conficker rock and roll hall of fame zach braff kevin federline mega millions

Romney plays it safe on high-stakes debates (AP)

PETERBOROUGH, N.H. ? For as long as he's been the Republican front-runner, Mitt Romney has avoided taking firm positions on high-stakes Washington spending debates.

This week's example: The former Massachusetts governor's refusal to endorse or oppose a deficit-cutting plan introduced by members of his own party, with a key deadline looming. Romney's cautiousness builds on the play-it-safe approach he has employed on issues ranging from Medicare overhauls to debt-ceiling negotiations, drawing criticism from GOP rivals and raising questions among uncommitted Republicans.

"It's a risky move to not take a position," said Michael Dennehy, a New Hampshire-based Republican operative who led Sen. John McCain's presidential bid four years ago. "When there's going to be intense scrutiny in these final seven weeks, voters are going to want to see someone who is showing their capacity to lead."

Romney's campaign says the GOP presidential hopeful has consistently articulated his economic plans.

But he has shown little willingness to inject himself into congressional debates on an issue he lists among his priorities, and which could have a profound impact on the next president's work. Instead, he has tended to focus on general economic principles such as lower taxes and less government spending, referring people to his 300-page book for a detailed version of how he would govern.

His rivals have at times adopted similarly cautious approaches. But they've sought to use Romney's reticence to take a position against him, launching in recent days a new round of criticism against the candidate.

"Now is not the time to be indecisive, it's time to exercise leadership," Michele Bachmann told The Associated Press in an email Saturday. Responding a question about Romney's strategy, she asked: "If you can't lead now, how will you lead as president?"

A congressional supercommittee has until Wednesday to produce a plan to cut deficits by at least $1.2 trillion over 10 years. Failure would trigger automatic, across-the-board cuts to the Pentagon and a wide variety of domestic programs beginning in 2013.

Republican Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., recently offered a key concession ? agreeing to limits on tax breaks enjoyed by people who itemize their deductions, in exchange for lower overall tax rates for families at every income level. A growing number of Republicans in Congress have embraced a tax overhaul package that increases revenues if paired with significant spending cuts.

Romney says he's withholding final judgment because he hasn't seen the specific proposal. He's addressed the congressional debt debate only when forced to, and ignored the issue altogether at a town-hall style meeting with voters here Friday night focused on government spending.

It wasn't until the room was nearly empty that he answered a reporter's question about his reluctance to weigh in.

"I will not endorse any plan that raises revenues, raises taxes," Romney said, declining to address Toomey's proposal specifically. "What I will endorse is a plan that cuts spending and reforms our entitlements for future generations to make sure they're sustainable."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry's campaign has blasted what it called Romney's "timid" approach.

"Mitt Romney soft-pedals the important issues facing this country," Perry spokesman Mark Miner said Saturday. "Washington doesn't need someone who's timid. They need someone like Rick Perry who's going to come in with a sledgehammer and shake things up."

Romney in some cases has been willing to embrace controversial policies. But he doesn't like to be the first to stick his neck out.

This spring, he was reluctant to embrace a plan introduced by Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan that would essentially transform Medicare into a voucher program.

He started by applauding Ryan's "creative and bold thinking," but didn't say whether he actually endorsed the proposal. Then in early November, seven months after Ryan's plan was released, Romney released his own plan to overhaul Medicare in a way largely consistent with the congressman's original proposal.

Over the summer, Romney was equally non-committal during a debate over the nation's debt limit that nearly forced a government shutdown and threatened the government's credit rating. He stayed silent on the debt-ceiling deal during its negotiation, announcing his opposition to the final agreement just before lawmakers cast their votes.

His Republican competitors haven't forgotten.

"Whether it's the debt ceiling debate, the Ohio ballot initiatives, or military action in Libya, Mitt Romney has been either unwilling or unable to offer a clear position on issues important to voters," said Tim Miller, candidate Jon Huntsman's spokesman. "Leadership requires taking a stand on tough issues, even if it carries political risk."

Outside the Republican presidential nomination race, some politicians were more sympathetic.

"It's the inherent risk of being the front-runner: you tend to be a little more cautious in your approach on potentially controversial issues," said Kevin Smith, a Republican candidate for New Hampshire governor. "I think it's only an issue to the extent that the other candidates make it an issue."

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111120/ap_on_el_pr/us_romney_playing_it_safe

occupy portland the hunger games neil degrasse tyson neil degrasse tyson bears lions bears lions kendall jenner

Monday, November 21, 2011

Deficit deal failure would pose crummy choice

Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, co-chair of the supercommittee, tells reporters outside his office that the deficit reduction panel would work over the weekend as the deadline for its work nears, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, co-chair of the supercommittee, tells reporters outside his office that the deficit reduction panel would work over the weekend as the deadline for its work nears, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., Co-Chair of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, often called the Supercommittee, speaks to reporters following a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., the Senate GOP whip, arrives for a meeting with bi-partisan members of the supercommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., member of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, often called the Supercommittee, speaks to reporters following a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., arrives for a meeting with bi-partisan members of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, often called the Supercommittee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Nov. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

(AP) ? If the deficit-cutting supercommittee fails, Congress will face a crummy choice. Lawmakers can allow payroll tax cuts and jobless aid for millions to expire or they extend them and increase the nation's $15 trillion debt by at least $160 billion.

President Barack Obama and Democrats on the deficit panel want to use the committee's product to carry their jobs agenda. That includes cutting in half the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax and extending jobless benefits for people who have been unemployed for more than six months.

Also caught up in what promises to be a chaotic legislative dash for the exits next month is the need to pass legislation to prevent an almost 30 percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors. Several popular business tax breaks and relief from the alternative minimum tax also expire at year's end.

A debt plan from the supercommittee, it was hoped, would have served as a sturdy, filibuster-proof vehicle to tow all of these expiring provisions into law. But after months of negotiations, Republicans and Democrats were far apart on any possible compromise, and there was no indication of progress Saturday.

Failure by the committee would leave lawmakers little time to pick up the pieces. And there's no guarantee it all can get done, especially given the impact of those measures on the spiraling debt.

Instead of cutting the deficit with a tough, bipartisan budget deal, Congress could pivot to spending enormous sums on expiring big-ticket policies.

If lawmakers rebel against the cost, as is possible, they would bear responsibility for allowing policies such as the payroll tax cut, enacted a year ago to help prop up the economy, to lapse.

Last year's extensions of jobless benefits and first-ever cut in the payroll tax were accomplished with borrowed money.

The 2 percent payroll tax cut expiring in December gave 121 million families a tax cut averaging $934 last year at a total cost of about $120 billion, according to the Tax Policy Center.

Obama wants to cut the payroll tax by another percentage point for workers at a total cost of $179 billion and reduce the employer share of the tax in half as well for most companies, which carries a $69 billion price tag.

"The notion of imposing a new payroll tax on people after Jan. 1 in the midst of this recession on working families is totally counterproductive," said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate.

Letting extended jobless assistance expire would mean that more than 6 million people would lose benefits averaging $296 a week next year, with 1.8 million cut off within a month.

Economist say those jobless benefits ? up to 99 weeks of them in high unemployment states ? are among the most effective way to stimulate the economy because unemployed people generally spend the money right away.

"We will have to address those issues," Durbin said.

Extending benefits to the long-term unemployed would cost almost $50 billion under Obama's plan. Preventing the Medicare payment cuts to doctors for an additional 18 months to two years would in all likelihood cost $26 billion to $32 billion more.

Lawmakers also had hoped to renew some tax breaks for business and prevent the alternative minimum tax from sticking more than 30 million taxpayers with higher tax bills. Those items could be addressed retroactively next year, but only increase the uncertainty among already nervous consumers and investors.

This time, Obama wants them to be paid for. But a move by Democrats to try to finance jobs measures with hundreds of billions of dollars in savings from drawing down troops in Iraq and Afghanistan has gotten a cold shoulder from top Republicans.

"I've made it pretty clear that those savings that are coming to us as a result of the wind-down of the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan should be banked, should not be used to offset other spending," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. He did not address whether war savings could be used to extend expiring tax cuts.

Those savings are the natural result of national security strategies unrelated to the federal budget. Deficit hawks say tapping into them is simply an accounting gimmick.

"It's just the worst of all worlds if that were to happen," said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

But without the war money at their disposal, lawmakers simply can't pay for the payroll tax cut and jobless benefits. Liberals such as Durbin are fine with employing deficit financing, especially if the alternative is playing Scrooge just before the holidays.

"Many people will hate to go home for Christmas saying to the American people, 'Merry Christmas, your payroll taxes go up 2 percent Jan. 1 and unemployment benefits are cut off.'"

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2011-11-19-Debt%20Supercommittee-What%20Next/id-2f022ff6dbac4bcda524c011da262844

coriolis effect giants patriots yolo steelers vs ravens keystone xl pipeline jack dempsey lake malawi